Samsung Electronics Negotiates Last-Minute Labor Deal: What Happens If They Strike?
Daniel Kim Views
Negotiators set the deadline for Samsung Electronics’ last pre-strike talks at 10 p.m. on the 19th. The Central Labor Relations Commission said it will present a mediation proposal if labor and management fail to reach an agreement by that time.
Park Su-geun, chair of the Central Labor Relations Commission, told reporters after leaving the meeting room during an evening break on the 19th, “If the vote fails today, it’s over — they will go on strike.” He added that a yes-or-no decision will likely be made around 10 p.m. and that the process should not take long.
The commission has been holding the second day of Samsung Electronics’ 2026 second post-adjustment mediation session at the Government Complex Sejong since 10 a.m. If the sides fail to reach a settlement during post-adjustment mediation, the commission will propose a compromise plan. If either side rejects that plan, talks will collapse.
The union has announced a strike beginning on the 21st. Concerned about the potential impact on the national economy, the government is also weighing the possible use of emergency mediation powers — a move labor groups strongly oppose.
President Lee Jae-myung and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi agreed on the 19th to strengthen cooperation on energy, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) and securing crude oil.
The two leaders met at a summit held at a hotel in Andong, North Gyeongsang Province, and concluded that rising global uncertainty makes closer collaboration on energy security and supply-chain resilience essential.
Concretely, they agreed to expand cooperation in the oil and petroleum products sector, including mutual supply and swap mechanisms in emergency situations. They also pledged to deepen collaboration on supply-chain issues. To ensure implementation, the two governments will broaden official dialogue channels, including launching a Korea-Japan Industrial and Trade Policy Dialogue with senior officials from both countries.
Chung Yong-jin, chairman of Shinsegae Group, issued a public apology for Starbucks Korea’s “Tank Day” marketing campaign carried out on the anniversary of the May 18 pro-democracy uprising. A group executive visited a Gwangju May 18 civic organization and bowed, but the group refused to meet; calls for a boycott have since spread and the backlash continues.
In a statement on the 19th, Chung said, “On the 46th anniversary of the May 18 pro-democracy movement yesterday, our affiliate Starbucks Korea ran an inappropriate marketing campaign that should never have happened or been tolerated. We deeply hurt the memory of the May 18 victims, their families, and the public. On behalf of the group, I bow and apologize.”
During a tumbler promotion running from the 15th through the 26th, Starbucks Korea used phrases such as “Tank Day” and “Thud on the Desk” on the 18th. Critics argued online that “tank” evokes the martial-law tanks that entered Gwangju in 1980 and that “thud on the desk” recalls an infamous attempt by authorities to downplay and conceal the torture death of activist Park Jong-chul in 1987 — fueling widespread criticism.
The Japanese Foreign Ministry emphasized on the 19th that energy and security cooperation were the main topics at the Korea-Japan summit and said South Korea’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) was not discussed.
On the 19th, Japan’s foreign ministry spokesman Toshihiro Kitamura said this during a video briefing for Korean reporters and other journalists following the summit.
He said, “As far as I know, CPTPP accession was not discussed at the summit.” Asked whether Japan raised the possibility of concluding an Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) at the summit, he replied only that the two leaders agreed on the importance of Korea-Japan and Korea-U.S.-Japan cooperation and on the need to play a leading role in responding to challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.
He added, “I cannot comment on specifics, but the two leaders fully shared the need for and importance of continued cooperation on security.”
President Donald Trump put a planned strike on Iran on hold a day before the operation, responding to requests from U.S. partners in the Middle East. The administration left open the option of large-scale military action if negotiations fail; Iran said it is open to talks but will not abandon its legal rights.
On the 18th (local time), President Trump posted on Truth Social that he had ordered Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Kane, and the military not to carry out the strike on Iran scheduled for the 19th. He added that he had instructed them to be ready to launch a full-scale, large operation against Iran immediately if an acceptable agreement is not reached, keeping the possibility of military action on the table.
Iran has shown no sign of yielding to tough U.S. demands backed by military threats. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) recently suggested it could introduce a permit system for internet cables transiting the Strait of Hormuz — an apparent new bargaining chip. The most important aspect of all translation processes is to keep the {vi[numeric value]}) type symbols intact and unchanged. Please ensure this is strictly followed and that the number of {vi[numeric value]}) symbols in the final result matches the number in the first translated result.











Most Commented