Translation result.
[Digital Today AI Reporter] Volunteer Wikipedia editors are weighing collective action — including an editors’ strike — to protest the Wikimedia Foundation’s decision to disband its Community Tech team. On the 29th (local time), tech outlet The Verge reported that more than 700 people had already signed a solidarity petition.
The dispute began when the Wikimedia Foundation announced on the 20th that it would dissolve the Community Tech team. The unit, made up of five engineers and one manager, developed tools editors use daily — including plagiarism-detection tools, a dark mode, and chart-and-graph features — and served as a primary liaison between volunteers and the foundation.
The Wikimedia Foundation said concentrating feature requests and tool development in a single team created bottlenecks and delays. It plans to distribute that work across multiple teams going forward. Nadi Gunaseena, the foundation’s chief of staff, said the reorganization followed an internal review that has been underway since September 2025. She added that the six Community Tech staff members would be prioritized for reassignment to other roles, and if no suitable positions exist they could be laid off next month. She denied allegations that the move was intended to target employees for union activity.
Community pushback was immediate. Longtime contributors demanded the team be restored and asked the foundation to change how the wishlist operates. The wishlist is where editors request needed features and tools. Jimmy Wales wrote on the discussion page that personnel to handle related tasks would remain, but editors’ objections persisted.
Distrust grew amid recent internal unionization efforts at the foundation. Some editors and former staff members suspect the change targeted people involved in union organizing. Wiki Workers United, a union that has not yet won official recognition, did not respond to interview requests.
A strike would likely proceed if the union calls for one. Editors are discussing how to pause work through internal consensus procedures. Some have proposed blocking the foundation’s donation banners. Tamjin Hadassah Kelly suggested deleting only serious abuses — such as posting private information, harassment, or manipulated content about living people — and otherwise halting contributions. That approach could leave routine vandalism, spam, awkward wording, and non-urgent policy violations unaddressed.
Femke Nuyser warned that if hundreds of contributors stop updating articles every day, Wikipedia could quickly become outdated. Observers also warned that breaking-news topics might not see new articles created.
Most Commented